This paper presents a case study aimed at identifying and forecasting the most promising technologies for solid waste treatment, a problem that affects the entire world. To achieve this objective, the authors used a recently developed TRIZ Roadmap for Technology Scouting that employs such TRIZ tools as Main Parameters of Value (MPV) analysis, Voice of the Product (VOP), QEA-screening, and Trends of Engineering System Evolution (TESE) analysis. As a result of using this roadmap, it was found that the most promising technologies for solid waste treatment in the near future are those that involve gasification of waste at higher temperatures (up to 2000°C) in nearly anoxic conditions, which excludes combustion. The advantages of these technologies are: (1) they provide almost complete conversion of waste organics into synthesis gas, (2) they maximize recovery of metals, glass, and other secondary raw materials from inorganic residue, (3) they do not require careful preliminary sorting or sophisticated pre-treatment of waste, and (4) they are suitable for processing large volumes of waste (up to 1000 t / day). Additionally, the potential emissions of hazardous products, such as dioxins, furans and tar are eliminated, which means that these technologies can be implemented in residential areas, close to the final consumers of the generated synthesis gas and inorganic by-products. The TRIZ Roadmap for Technology Scouting used in this case study can be useful for finding technologies to solve other environmental problems, as it ultimately leads to effective solutions for saving and recycling all kinds of resources available in nature.

Full Text:



O'Connell, E.J.: Increasing public participation in municipal solid waste reduction. The Geographical Bulletin 52(2), 105–118 (2011).

Samiha, B.: The importance of the 3R principle of municipal solid waste management for achieving sustainable development. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 4(3), 129–135 (2013).

Ritchie, H., Roser, M.: Urbanization. Published online. (2018). Available at:, last accessed 2020/05/31.

Geyer, R., Jambeck, J.R., Law, K.L.: Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Science Advances 3(7), e1700782 (2017).

Joshi, R., Ahmed, S.: Status and challenges of municipal solid waste management in India: A review. Cogent Environmental Science 2(1), 1139434 (2016).

Milisavljevic-Syed, J., Tomić, M., Marković, D., Miltenović, V.: Application of the TRIZ method for selecting thermal treatment procedure and obtaining energy from waste. Facta Universitatis – Series Mechanical Engineering 8(1), 77–88 (2010).

Swee, N., Yip, M., Chee Sheng, K., Tai, S., Toh, G.: Managing E-waste using TRIZ. International Journal of Electronics and Electrical Engineering 1(1), 19–22 (2013).

Russo, D., Peri, P., Spreafico, C.: TRIZ applied to waste pyrolysis project in Morocco. In: Benmoussa R., De Guio R., Dubois S., Koziołek S. (eds.) New Opportunities for Inno-vation Breakthroughs for Developing Countries and Emerging Economies. 19th International TRIZ Future Conference, TFC 2019, pp. 295–304. Springer, Cham (2019).

Abramov, O., Fimin, P., Smirnova, E.: Technology scouting in chemistry: roadmap and case studies. In: Proceedings of the 15th MATRIZ TRIZfest International Conference, pp. 319–326. Heilbronn, Germany (2019).

Rohrbeck, R.: Technology Scouting – a case study on the Deutsche Telekom Laboratories. In ISPIM–Asia Conference 2007, New Delhi, India (2007). Available at SSRN web site:, last accessed 2020/05/28.

Rohrbeck, R.: Harnessing a network of experts for competitive advantage: technology scouting in the ICT industry. R&D Management 40(2), 169–180 (2010).

Litvin, S.: New TRIZ-Based tool Function-Oriented Search (FOS). In: Castini, G. (eds.) TRIZ Future Conference 2004, vol. 16, pp. 505–508. Firenze University Press, Firenze, Italy (2004).

Litvin, S.: Main Parameters of Value: TRIZ-based tool connecting business challenges to technical problems in product/process innovation. PowerPoint presentation for the workshop at 7th Japan TRIZ Symposium. Yokohama, Japan (2011). Available at Japan TRIZ Society web site:, last accessed 2020/05/28.

Abramov, O.Y.: Product-oriented MPV analysis to identify Voice of the product. In: Proceedings of the 12th MATRIZ TRIZfest International Conference, pp. 231–243. Beijing, People’s Republic of China (2016).

Abramov, O.Y.: ‘Voice of the Product’ to supplement ‘Voice of the Customer’. . In: Proceedings of the 11th MATRIZ TRIZfest International Conference, pp. 309–317. Seoul, South Korea (2015).

Abramov, O.Y.: Generating new product ideas with TRIZ-derived ‘Voice of the Product’ and Quantum-Economic Analysis (QEA). Journal of the European TRIZ Association IN-NOVATOR 4(2), pp. 80–87 (2017).

Abramov, O., Markosov, S., Medvedev, A.: Experimental validation of Quantum-Economic Analysis (QEA) as a screening tool for new product development. In: Koziołek, S., Chechurin, L., Collan M. (eds.) Advances and Impacts of the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving, pp. 17–25. Springer, Cham (2018).

Lyubomirskiy, A., Litvin, S., Ikovenko, S., Thurnes, C., Adunka, R.: Trends of Engineering System Evolution (TESE): TRIZ paths to innovation. TRIZ Consulting Group (2018).

Freudenrich, C.: How landfills work. Published online (2000). Available at:, last accessed 2020/08/13.

Jenkins, S.D., Legrand, R.: Conversion technologies: A new option for MSW management. In: Proceedings of the 13th Annual North American Waste to Energy Conference (NAWTEC13-3153), pp. 55–61. Orlando, FL, USA (2005).

Bosmans, A., Vanderreydt, I., Geysen, D., Helsen, L.: The crucial role of Waste-to-Energy technologies in enhanced landfill mining: a technology review. Journal of Cleaner Production 55, 10–23 (2013).

Pieta, I.S., Epling, W.S., Kazmierczuk, A., Lisowski, P., Nowakowski, R., Serwicka E.M.: Waste into fuel – catalyst and process development for MSW valorisation. Catalysts 8(3), 113 (2018).

Options for the treatment of principal fractions of the municipal waste considering the local framework. In: Bilitewski, B., Wagner, J., and Reichenbach, J. (eds.) Best Practice Municipal Waste Management, pp. 29–44. Umweltbundesamt, Dessau-Roßlau (2018).

Ferrari, M.: Is plasma gasification the solution for plastics and all waste? Published online (2020). Available at:, last accessed 2020/06/05.

Mukherjee, A., Debnath, B., Ghosh, S.K.: A review on technologies of removal of dioxins and furans from incinerator flue gas. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 35 528–540, (2016).

Eriksson, O., Finnveden, G.: Energy recovery from waste incineration – the importance of technology data and system boundaries on CO2 emissions. Energies 10(4), 539, (2017).

Byun, Y., Cho, M., Hwang, S. M., Chung, J.: Thermal plasma gasification of municipal solid waste (MSW). Gasification for Practical Applications, 183–210 (2012).

The Alter NRG / Westinghouse Plasma Gasification Process. Independent Waste Technology report. Juniper Consultancy Services Limited, Bathurst House, Bisley, UK (2008).

Nicolae, B.: Plasma gasification the Waste-to-Energy solution for the future. Problemele Energeticii Regionale 3(26), 107–115 (2014).


  • There are currently no refbacks.