COHESIVE GROUP MODEL FOR WORKING IN AN ONLINE ENVIRONMENT

Silviu Nicusor SURU, Bogdan Mihai UMANSCHI, Gabriela PROSTEAN, Olivia GIUCA

Abstract


Since the pandemic context, it has migrated to the online environment. The Industry 4.0 progressed and extended the boundaries of human relations. Since the boom of the online meetings, the issue of solving certain group workshops appeared. The identifying of cohesion methods and the ability to work in groups in an online environment has become a topic of research. Our research is limited to online teamwork in Industry 4.0. The challenge is to keep the cohesion of the groups. Teamwork has acquired special importance due to the multitude of requirements. We aim to develop methods for adapting personal motivation in the case of online teamwork consisting of generations involved, a model that can be used in the production process. 

Full Text:

PDF

References


Salgado, J.F., The Big Five personality dimensions and counterproductive behaviors, International Journal of Selection and assessment, Wiley, pp 117 -125, ISSN online:1468-2389, March 2002.

Gundlach, M.J., Martinko, M.J., Douglas, S.C., Emotional intelligence, causal reasoning, and the self‐efficacy development process, The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, ISSN 1055-3185, March 2003.

McLeod, S., Attribution Theory, http://www.simplypsychology.org/attribution-theory.html

Sinek, S., Mead, D., Docker, P., Find your why: A practical guide for discovering purpose for you and your team, Penguin Random House, pg 256, ISBN 9780241279267, New York, 2017.

Proștean, G., Management, Editura Orizonturi Universitare, pg 230, ISBN 978-973638-336-6, Timișoara, 2008.

Pink, D.H., When: The scientific secrets of perfect timing, Riverhead Books, pg 272, ISBN 978-0735210622, 2018.

Kuhl, J., Quirin, M., Koole, S.L., The functional architecture of human motivation: Personality systems interactions theory, Advances in Motivation Science, Elsevier Ltd., pp. 1-62, ISBN 9780128226841, 2021.

Legault, L., Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences, ISBN 978-3-319-24612-3, 2020.

Khazei, M., Shukor, A.R., Biotech, M., A Novel Instrument for Integrated Measurement and Assessment of Intrinsic Motivation, Team Climate, and Burnout in Multidisciplinary Teams, The Permanente Journal, 24, 2020, https://www.thepermanentejournal.org/component/content/article/43-the-permanent-journal/original-research-and-contributions-7373-a-novel-instrument-for-integrated-measurment-and-assement-of-intrinsic-motivation,-team-climate,-and-burnout-in-multidisciplinary-teams.html#ref

Pillarisetty, K.N., Madhavan, S., Jyotishi, A., An Exploratory Study on Motivation 3.0 among the Indian IT Workforce Force, Productivity 59(2), pp.121-130, 2018.

Fero, M., Dokoupilová, L., Factors of work motivation and coexistence of generations at the workplace, Research Papers Faculty of Materials Sciences and Technology Slovak, University of Technology, eISSN 1338-0532, pp 15-24, Vol 27, December 2019.

Mahmoud, A.B., Fuxman, L., Mohr, I., Reisel, W.D., Grigoriou, N., “We aren't your reincarnation!” workplace motivation across X, Y and Z generations, International Journal of Manpower, ISSN 0143-7720, June, 2020.

Mahmoud, A.B., Reisel, W.D., Grigoriou, N., Fuxman, L., Mohr, I., The reincarnation of work motivation: Millennials vs older generations, International Sociology, Vol 35(4), pp.393-414, Jul 2020.

Kramb, M., How to Navigate in a Generationally Diverse Workforce: A Multi-Case Study on Leaders Who Manage a Multigenerational Team, Doctoral dissertation, Ashland University, https://etd.ohiolink.edu/apexprod/rws_etd/send_file/send?accession=ashland1612517688539311&disposition=inline

Heyns, M.M., Kerr, M.D., Generational differences in workplace motivation, SA Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 16(1), pp. 1-10, ISSN 1683-7584, May, 2018.

Hee, O.C., Rhung, L.X., Motivation and employee retention among millennials in Malaysia, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Vol. 9(2), pp. 876 -884, ISSN 2222-6990, 2019.

Tokarz, A., Malinowska, D., From psychological theoretical assumptions to new research perspectives in sustainability and sustainable development: Motivation in the workplace, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/8/2222/htm

Harappa, The learning process and its stages, https://harappa.education/harappa-diaries/learning-process-and-stages-of-learning/?fbclid=IwAR1QIgSIsrLoLWgPH8SWrtfCXsb-QJJLk-5aOvqv9fQbnkJoM3jJg4cDDSA

Mueller, J.S., Is your team too big? Too small? What’s the right number, https://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/is-your-team-too-big-too-small-whats-the-right-number-2/

Harrington-Atkinson, T., Dunn and Dunn Learning Style, https://tracyharringtonatkinson.com/dunn-and-dunn-learning-style/

Chiș, V., Albulescu, I., Catalano, H., Dimensiuni ale educației și formării în școala contemporană, Editura Eikon, pp 487, ISBN 978-973-757-914-0, 2013.

Gogan, L. M., Duran, D. C., Draghici, A., Structural capital-A proposed measurement model, Procedia economics and finance, 23, 1139-1146, 2015.

Harpan, I., Draghici, A., Debate on the multilevel model of the human capital measurement. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 124, 170-177, 2014.

Gogan, L.M., Rennung, F., Fistis, G., Draghici, A., A proposed tool for managing intellectual capital in small and medium size enterprises, Procedia Technology, 16, 728-736, 2014.

Draghici, A., Baban, C. F., Ivascu, L. V., Sarca, I. (2015). Key success factors for university–industry collaboration in open innovation, Proceedings of the ICERI2015, ISBN: 978-84-608-2657-6, 7357-7365, IATED, 2015.

Paschek, D., Rennung, F., Trusculescu, A., Draghici, A., Corporate development with agile business process modeling as a key success factor, Procedia Computer Science, 100, 1168-1175, 2016.

Albulescu, C. T., Draghici, A., Fistiş, G. M., Trusculescu, A., Does ISO 9001 quality certification influence labor productivity in EU-27? Procedia of Social and Behavioral


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


JOURNAL INDEXED IN :