THE DATA JOURNEY FRAMEWORK: PROPOSAL OF FORMAL REPRESENTATION OF DATA AGENTS, ASSETS, AND STATES FROM DATA GENERATION TO DATA SERVING IN A DATA-CENTRIC OPERATING ENVIRONMENT

Alexandre SURKUS-CASTRO, Fernando DESCHAMPS, Edson PINHEIRO DE LIMA, Déborah SARRIA, Anis ASSAD NET, Sergio GOUVEA E. DA COSTA

Abstract


In the ever-expanding landscape of data-intensive operations, such as Data Analytics, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning, where massive computational resources and extensive data are essential, the need for reliable and consistent attributes for data and operating agents becomes paramount. While frameworks like Archimate® and BPMN enable functional and semantic representation of organizational architecture and processes at a higher abstraction level, the data context lacks a comprehensive framework capable of capturing its components' semantic and functional aspects, from minor to big data infrastructures. This paper proposes a novel ontological framework that addresses this gap, offering a semantic and practical representation approach for data-centric business contexts. The proposed model encompasses the entire data journey, starting from data generation, moving through various stages of maturity within the value chain, and culminating in its utilization by consumer business platforms. The framework aims to be vendor-agnostic and intelligible across diverse organizations and technological ecosystems, fostering interoperability and collaboration. By leveraging this ontological framework, organizations can enhance data operations, ensuring reliability, consistency, and compliance while facilitating effective communication and decision-making within and between entities.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Mehta S, Kothuri P, Garcia DL. A big data architecture for log data storage and analysis. In: Stud. Comput. Intell. Springer Verlag, pp. 201–209.

Open Group TOG. The ArchiMate 3.2 Specification, http://www.opengroup.org (2022).

Inc. OMG. Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) 2.0, http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0.

Jacinto M, Rivera M, Viacava G. Lean Service and BPM to Increase the Efficiency of an Operational Process in the Insurance Sector. In: ACM Int. Conf. Proc. Ser. Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 218–222.

Fernandes J, Reis J, Melão N, et al. The role of industry 4.0 and bpmn in the arise of condition-based and predictive maintenance: a case study in the automotive industry. Appl Sci; 11. Epub ahead of print 2021. DOI: 10.3390/app11083438.

Esposito C, Cosenza C, Gerbino S, et al. Virtual shimming simulation for smart assembly of aircraft skin panels based on a physics-driven digital twin. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) 2022; 16: 753–763.

de Oliveira Cesar de Moraes HR, Sanchez O, Brown S, et al. Trust and distrust in big data recommendation agents. In: Int. Conf. Inf. Syst., ICIS. Association for Information Systems (2019).

Guerrero-Prado JS, Alfonso-Morales W, Caicedo-Bravo EF. A data analytics/big data framework for advanced metering infrastructure data. Sensors; 21. Epub ahead of print 2021. DOI: 10.3390/s21165650.

Zarour K, Benmerzoug D, Guermouche N, et al. A systematic literature review on BPMN extensions. Business Process Management Journal 2020; 26: 1473–1503.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


JOURNAL INDEXED IN :