EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON MULTIPASS AWJ PERFORMANCE ON HARDOX 500 WORKPIECES
Abstract
a wide number of passes, namely 1 to 4 under different jet pressure and mass flow rate values. Research has demonstrated that setting the right cutting parameters can result in superior performance with multipass cutting compared to single-pass cutting. It was shown that multipass cutting is rather efficient in increasing the depth of penetration and reducing kerf taper angle, as 3 to 9 times higher depths and 2 to 4 times lower kerf angles were able to be obtained especially for pressure and abrasive mass flow rate values of 250 MPa and 7 g/s, respectively, whereas kerf width was affected to a lesser extent by the number of passes.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Shipway, P., Fowler, G., Pashby, I., Characteristics of the surface of a titanium alloy following milling with abrasive waterjets, Wear, Volume 258, Issues 1–4, Pages 123-132, ISSN 0043-1648, 2005
Fowler, G., Shipway, P., Pashby, I., Abrasive water-jet controlled depth milling of Ti6Al4V alloy – an investigation of the role of jet–workpiece traverse speed and abrasive grit size on the characteristics of the milled material, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Volume 161, Issue 3, Pages 407-414, ISSN 0924-0136, 2005
Wang, J., Guo, D., The cutting performance in multipass abrasive waterjet machining of industrial ceramics, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Volume 133, Issue 3, Pages 371-377, ISSN 0924-0136, 2003
Wang, J., Zhong, Y., Enhancing the depth of cut in abrasive waterjet cutting of alumina ceramics by using multipass cutting with nozzle oscillation,
Machining Science and Technology,
:1, 76-91, 2009
Miao, X., Qiang, Z., Wu, M., Song, L., Ye, F., The optimal cutting times of multipass abrasive water jet cutting. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 97, 1779–1786, 2018.
Xiong, J., Wan, L., Qian, Y., Sun, S., Li, D., Wu, S. New strategy for improving the surface quality of Ti6Al4V machined by abrasive water jet: Reverse cutting with variable standoff distances. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 120, 5339–5350, 2022.
Hlavac, L., Spadło, S., Krajcarz, D., Hlavacova, I., Influence traverse speed on surface quality after water-jet cutting for hardox steel, Proceedings of the Metal, 2015.
Krenicky, T., Olejarova, S., Servatka, M. Assessment of the Influence of Selected Technological Parameters on the Morphology Parameters of the Cutting Surfaces of the Hardox 500 Material Cut by Abrasive Water Jet Technology. Materials, 15, 1381, 2022
Perec, A., Musial, W., Prazmo, J., Sobczak, R., Radomska-Zalas, A., Fajdek-Bieda, A., Nagnajewicz, S., Pude F., Multi-criteria Optimization of the Abrasive Waterjet Cutting Process for the High-Strength and Wear-Resistant Steel Hardox®500. In: Klichová, D., Sitek, L., Hloch, S., Valentinčič, J. (eds) Advances in Water Jetting. Water Jet 2019. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, Springer, 2021
Perec, A. Desirability Function Analysis (DFA) in Multiple Responses Optimization of Abrasive Water Jet Cutting Process. Reports in Mechanical Engineering, 3(1), 11–19, 2022.
Hashish, M. Pressure effects in abrasive-waterjet (AWJ) machining. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, Volume 111, Issue 3, 1989.
Shibin, R., Anandakrishnan, V., Sathish, S., Vinod MallemalaSujana, Investigation on the abrasive water jet machinability of AA2014 using SiC as abrasive, Materials Today: Proceedings, Volume 21, Part 1, Pages 519-522, ISSN 2214-7853, 2020.
Yuan, Y., Chen, J., Gao, H., Wang, X. An investigation into the abrasive waterjet milling circular pocket on titanium alloy. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 107, 4503–4515, 2020.
Hlaváč, L.M., Gembalová, L., Štěpán, P., Hlavacova, I. Improvement of abrasive water jet machining accuracy for titanium and TiNb alloy. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 80, 1733–1740, 2015.
Karmiris‐ Obratański, P., Karkalos, N., Kudelski, R., Papazoglou, E., Markopoulos, A. On the Effect of Multiple Passes on Kerf Characteristics and Efficiency
of Abrasive Waterjet Cutting. Metals, 11, 74, 20
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.