INTEGRATED STUDY OF SURFACE ROUGHNESS PARAMETERS AND DIMENSIONAL ACCURACY IN FDM 3D-PRINTED COMPONENTS
Abstract
This study investigates the influence of FDM printing parameters and PLA filament type on the surface roughness and dimensional accuracy of 3D-printed timing belt pulley samples. Eight samples were produced using different nozzle diameters, layer heights, infill strategies, and PLA materials. Surface roughness was measured using a Jenoptik W912RC profilometer and an Alicona Infinite Focus microscope. The results show that smaller nozzle diameters and lower layer heights improve surface quality, while material selection also affects roughness values. The findings confirm that optimized printing parameters are essential for improving surface finish and dimensional accuracy.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
ISO/ASTM 52900:2021, Additive manufacturing - General principles - Fundamentals and vocabulary, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2021.
Wong, K. V., and Hernandez, A., A Review of Additive Manufacturing, ISRN Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 2012, Article ID 208760, 2012. doi: 10.5402/2012/208760.
Gibson, I., Rosen, D., Stucker, B., and Khorasani, M., Additive Manufacturing Technologies, 3rd ed., Springer, Cham, 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-56127-7.
Ngo, T. D., Kashani, A., Imbalzano, G., Nguyen, K. T. Q., and Hui, D., Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges, Composites Part B: Engineering, Vol. 143, pp. 172-196, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012.
Kristiawan, R. B., Imaduddin, F., Ariawan, D., Ubaidillah, and Arifin, Z., A review on the fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printing: Filament processing, materials, and printing parameters, Open Engineering, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 639-649, 2021. doi: 10.1515/eng-2021-0063.
Anitha, R., Arunachalam, S., and Radhakrishnan, P., Critical parameters influencing the quality of prototypes in fused deposition modelling, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 118, No. 1-3, pp. 385-388, 2001. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00980-3.
Ahn, S. H., Montero, M., Odell, D., Roundy, S., and Wright, P. K., Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS, Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 248-257, 2002. doi: 10.1108/13552540210441166.
Sood, A. K., Ohdar, R. K., and Mahapatra, S. S., Parametric appraisal of fused deposition modelling process using the grey Taguchi method, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, Vol. 224, No. 1, pp. 135-145, 2010. doi: 10.1243/09544054JEM1565.
Thompson, M. K., Moroni, G., Vaneker, T., Fadel, G., Campbell, R. I., Gibson, I., Bernard, A., Schulz, J., Graf, P., Ahuja, B., and Martina, F., Design for Additive Manufacturing: Trends, opportunities, considerations, and constraints, CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 65, No. 2, pp. 737-760, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2016.05.004.
Ford, S., and Despeisse, M., Additive manufacturing and sustainability: An exploratory study of the advantages and challenges, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 137, pp. 1573-1587, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.150.
Wittbrodt, B. T., Glover, A. G., Laureto, J., Anzalone, G. C., Oppliger, D., Irwin, J. L., and Pearce, J. M., Life-cycle economic analysis of distributed manufacturing with open-source 3-D printers, Mechatronics, Vol. 23, No. 6, pp. 713-726, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2013.06.002.
Taufik, M., and Jain, P. K., Role of build orientation in layered manufacturing: A review, International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, Vol. 27, No. 1/2/3, pp. 47-73, 2013. doi: 10.1504/IJMTM.2013.058637.
Lu, C., Study on prediction of surface quality in machining process, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 205, No. 1-3, pp. 439-450, 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.270.
Galantucci, L. M., Lavecchia, F., and Percoco, G., Experimental study aiming to enhance the surface finish of fused deposition modeled parts, CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 189-192, 2009. doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2009.03.071.
ISO 21920-2:2021, Geometrical product specifications (GPS) - Surface texture: Profile - Part 2: Terms, definitions and surface texture parameters, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2021.
Boschetto, A., and Bottini, L., Design for manufacturing of surfaces to improve accuracy in Fused Deposition Modeling, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 37, pp. 103-114, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.rcim.2015.07.005.
Frunzaverde, D., Cojocaru, V., Bacescu, N., Ciubotariu, C.-R., Miclosina, C.-O., Turiac, R. R., and Marginean, G., The influence of the layer height and the filament color on the dimensional accuracy and the tensile strength of FDM-printed PLA specimens, Polymers, Vol. 15, No. 10, Article 2377, 2023. doi: 10.3390/polym15102377.
Tymrak, B. M., Kreiger, M., and Pearce, J. M., Mechanical properties of components fabricated with open-source 3-D printers under realistic environmental conditions, Materials & Design, Vol. 58, pp. 242-246, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.038.
ISO 21920-3:2021, Geometrical product specifications (GPS) - Surface texture: Profile - Part 3: Specification operators, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2021.
Jenoptik / HOMMEL ETAMIC, WAVEline Roughness and Contour Metrology, Product brochure, Available online: https://www.jenoptik.cz/files/products-en/roughness-contour-measurement/roughness-contour-measurement_10072148_01_2016_en.pdf, Accessed: 18 May 2026.
Bruker Alicona, InfiniteFocus G6: Optical surface roughness measuring device for smooth surfaces, Available online: https://www.alicona.com/en/products/infinitefocus, Accessed: 18 May 2026.
Bruker Alicona, Focus-Variation: Roughness and shape measurement in one system, Available online: https://www.alicona.com/en/technologies/focus-variation, Accessed: 18 May 2026.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

