ESTIMATING THE IMPORTANCE OF THE ATTRIBUTES OF A NEW PRODUCT IN DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
Abstract
In this paper our intent was to go through a theoretical study of estimating the importance of the attributes of a new product in development process and the methods for decision making. Also we shortly presented modern methods like: Fuzzy, Pahl and Beitz , QFD Matrix, AHP, or EVA, used in analysis and selection of multivariable concepts .
Key words: attributes, concepts, conjoint analysis, consumer, fuzzy methods, QFD MatrixFull Text:
PDFReferences
Jaccard, J., Brinberg, D., Ackerman, L.J. Assessing Attribute Importance: A Comparison of Six Methods. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(March): 463-468, (1986).
Green, P.E., Krieger, A.M. Attribute Importance Weights Modification in Assessing a Brands Competitive Potential. Marketing Science, 14(3): 253-270, (1995)
Meyer, R., Johnson, E.J. (1995) Empirical Generalizations in the Modeling of Consumer Choice. Marketing Science, 14(3): 180-189, (1995)
Corstjens, M.L., Gautschi, D.A. Formal choice Models in Marketing. Marketing Science, 2(1): 19-56, (1983)
Gensch D.H., Svetska J.A. (1979) An Exact Hierarchical Algorithm for Determining Aggregate Statistics from Individual Choice Data. Management Science, 25(10): 939-952, (1979).
Alpert, M.I. Identification of Determinant Attributes: A comparison of Methods. Journal of Marketing Research, 8(May):184-91, (1971)
Verlegh, P.W.J, Schifferstein, H.N.J., Wittinik D.R. Range and Number of Levels in Derived and Stated Measures of Attribute Importance. Marketing Letters,13(1): 41-52, (2002).
Luce, D.R., Tukey, J.W. Simultaneous Conjoint Measurement: A New Type of Fundamental Measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1: 1-27, (1964).
Green, P.E., Rao, V.R. Conjoint Measurement for quantifying judgemental data. Journal of Marketing Research, 8(3): 355-363, (1971).
Kanda, N. Group Interviews and Questionnaire Surveys. Quality Control, August: 77-85, (1994).
Green, P.E., Srinivisan, V. Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook. Journal of Consumer Research, 5(September): 103-23, (1978)
Green, P.E., Krieger, A., Wind, Y. Thirty Years of Conjoint Analysis: reflections and Propsects. Interfaces, 31(3): S56-S73, (2001).
Green P.E., Krieger A.M. Individualized Hybrid Models for Conjoint Analysis. Management Science, 42(6): 850-867, (1996).
Green, P.E., Srinivisan, V. Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice. Journal of Marketing, October: 3-19, (1975)
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.