Abstract
In the present paper, we tried to create a philosophy and a methodology for the aesthetic dimensions of sustainable design. The arguments are: Aesthetics and sustainable design are not opposed to each other the beauty concept being inherent in the definition and principles of sustainability; There is the need for a clear set of principles for environmental conscious aesthetics; Aesthetic strategies in sustainable design have to evolved based on scientific method and the results validated through experience; Designers can promote sustainability by embracing the shape of things; Basic decisions about form, the visual and kinesthetic aspect of design, are essential for sustainability. The following paper offers a variety of ideas that together provide a more comprehensive approach to sustainable aesthetics, which we hope will expand the dialogue on how design can promote better products, and through extension, a better environment. Is the result of our attempt to provide a basis for including aesthetics in sustainable product development, bringing economic and social, moral and spiritual arguments.
References
Hosey, L., 2012. The Shape of Green: Aesthetics, Ecology, and Design. Washington: Island Press.
Wong, W., 1993. Principles of Form and Design. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Zec, P., 2000. Good Design: Lifestyle and Product Culture. Essen: Design Zentrum Nordrhein Westfalen.
McLennan, J.F., 2004. The Philosophy of Sustainable Design. Kansas City, MO: Ecotone.
Brochmann, O., 1970. Good or Bad Design. London: Studio Vista, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
Vianu, T., 1968. Estetica. Bucuresti: Editura Științifică
Vianu, T., 1942. Introducere în teoria valorilor: întemeiată pe observatia constiintei. Bucuresti: Cugetarea-Georgescu Delafras.
Münsterberg, H., 1921. Philosophie der Werte. Grundzüge einer Weltanschauung, 1907, 2 Aufl., 1921, p. 186-7.
Email the author 
