A NEW TOOL FOR COURSE DESCRIPTION USABLE IN E-LEARNING PLATFORMS DEVELOPING

Mircea-Viorel DRAGOI, Alexandru Catalin FILIP, Aurica Luminita PARV, Gheorghe OANCEA

Abstract


Setting up an academic programme is a complex task that must consider many data that obey specific rules, establish certain relationships between the elements involved, and respect a well-defined hierarchy. The central object of an academic programme is the course that plays the role of a brick in a building: it must fit perfectly between its neighbours that form a layer, which together with the lower and upper layers, must give the shape of a unitary system. The course, being the elementary unit of the academic programme, must be very accurately defined by its type, category, level, number and type of activities, number of hours allocated to each of it, number of credits, intended learning outcomes, and others. All these must give a full and balanced description of the course that depends on various data collected from different sources. The present paper proposes a new original tool, which works as a template file that aids the course designer in providing a complete and coherent description of a course, respecting some previously defined conditions. The tool’s novelty consists of a table-shaped document that combines selected-from-a-list, calculated, open inputs, and verification fields that signalize any error occurrence and provide hints for their correction in the process of course description. Using this tool, the course designer can easily provide an error-free course description, combining data collected from interconnected tables and adding specific pieces of information, so that it can be later used in e-learning platforms via import/export files.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Saldívar-Almorejo, M.M., et al. E-Learning Challenges in STEM Education. Educ. Sci., 2024 , 14, p. 1370-1386

Papaioannou, G., et al. Learning Spaces in Higher Education: A State-of-the-Art Review. Trends High. Educ. 2023, 2, 526–545.

Wagino, W., et al. Exploring the Full Potential of Collaborative Learning and E-Learning Environments in Universities: A Systematic Review. TEM Journal, 2023, 12. 1772–1785.

Jain, S., et al. Comparative Analysis of Frequently Used E-Learning Platforms. Front. Educ’, 2024, 9.

Mohd K., Nurul N., and Fariza K. Choosing the Right Learning Management System (LMS) for the Higher Education Institution Context: A Systematic Review. iJET, 2016, 11, 55-61.

Rus-Casas, C., et al. Online Tools for the Creation of Personal Learning Environments in Engineering Studies for Sustainable Learning. Sustainability, 2021, 13, 1179-1797.

The Moodle LMS Platform, Available online: https://moodle.com/about/the-moodle-story/ (accessed on December, 2024)

Gamage, S.H.P.W., et al. A Systematic Review on Trends in Using Moodle for Teaching and Learning. Int. j. STEM educ, 2022, 9, 9-33.

ESCO – European Skills, Competences, Qualifications and Occupations, https://esco.ec.europa.eu/en/classification (Accessed December 2024)

Melillán, A., et al. Software Development and Tool Support for Curriculum Design: A Systematic Mapping Study. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 7711.

Dafoulas, G., et al. Curriculum design tools: Using information modelling for course transformation and mapping, International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET), Istanbul, Turkey, 2012, 1-5.

Cuevas, P., et al. Course Editor: A Course Planning Tool Compatible with IMS‐LD. Comp. App. Eng. Ed. 2013, 21, 421–31.

Baldwin, S.J., and Yu-Hui C. An Online Course Design Checklist: Development and Users’ Perceptions. JCHE, 2019, 31 156–172.

Piriyapongpipat, P., et al. An alternative approach to ontology-based curriculum development in higher education. Smart Learn. Environ., 2024, 11, 20.

Conklin, S., et al. Is AI the New Course Creator Discov. educ., 2024, 3, 285-283.

Arandiga, RMA; González, VC; Sola, BJR; Barrachina, EV. ]A. Proposal for an Extended Course. Innovacion. Educativa 2023, 33, 1-19.

Vlachopoulos, D., Assuring Quality in E-Learning Course Design: The Roadmap. IRRODL, 2016, 17, 183-205.

Sampson, D.G., Zervas, P., Limnatitis, R, ASK-CDM-ECTS: A Tool for Facilitating Common European University Course Description towards Higher Education Integration. In the Proceedings of ICALT: 2009 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Riga, Latvia, 15-17 Jul 2009.

The Common Aggregation Hierarchy (CAH], https://www.hesa.ac.uk/collection/coding-manual-tools/hecoscahdata/cah (Accessed January 2026)

Bringuier, JP, Paultre, CZ. New Educational-Tool - Course Description. LYON PHARM 1979, 20 125-131.

Benjamin S. Bloom, Max D. Engelhart, Edward J. Furst, Walker H. Hill, David R. Krathwohl, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. Longmans, Green, New York, USA, 1956

John B. Biggs, Kevin F. Collis, Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The SOLO Taxonomy (Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome), Academic Press, London, UK, 1982


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


JOURNAL INDEXED IN :